LOVE IN THE MOURNING
15th February - 6th March 2011
Raphael Buttonshaw, Brent Harris, Helen
Johnson, Andrew McQualter, Joshua Petherick, Dioni Salas, Kate Smith
Opening 6pm Tuesday 15 February 2011
Curated by Helen Johnson
The initiation of this exhibition arose from
an interest in 'the end of painting' and, more specifically, what it
means to be working as a painter in a contemporary context, with some
distance from the narratives of modernism. It is grounded in the consideration
of all the baggage, debates and difficulties becoming a part of the medium
itself - what can be done today with all of this stuff? Not least the
narrative of 'the end' that was never really actuated; which is to
say, what is being thought is painting as a symbolic space rather than
a specific medium, with an understanding of the historical narratives
of painting as having participated in the production of that space.
As Helmut Draxler has written, 'A post-avantgardist approach to art
criticism, then, must seek first and foremost to reveal the logics of
the specifically modern divisions between high and low art, between gestures
of new beginning and rhetorics of ruin, between universal competency
and forever particular manifestations; and thus to reconstruct painting
as such as a symbolic formation that both lets us understand these divisions
and offers a different model of interrelation: in the modes of a specific
form of thought, of complex and varied conjunctions between discourse
and praxis, or of the articulations of the different forms of relation
between image, art, and production.
Instead of the direct logics of the embodiment of emphatic life, heroic
individualism, or then again of pop and trash, logics that were characteristic
of the various modernist and avant-gardist strategies, painting as such offers
a mode of interrelation that presupposes the growing differentiation
of its individual elements and is precisely therefore capable of restoring
the constellation that binds them. Today, however, painting as such no
longer constitutes a clearly defined aesthetic category to which we would
have unimpeded access.
It is an open cultural field between painting as it really exists,
the “new genres”, and a media-disseminated pop culture; the largely dismembered
elements of the apparatus of painting can be found scattered across this
field. That is to say, we must first track down its loose threads in
all these domains, establish their interrelations, and ascribe the aesthetic
events in a historic conception that by no means traces everything new
in reductionist fashion to something old. Instead, we can understand
the new, rather than its mythologized forms, in the
historical grammar of its transformations, in which we can keep the process
of the differentiation between the discourses, of discourse and praxis,
of intention and effect visible.'[1].
Text by Helen Johnson
LESS